Current Conflict Where Civil Liberties and Human Rights Are at Stake

Peter Hitchens late mentioned in his web log that technology will eventually enslave us every. He referred to the recent pic "Ghost in the Crush' thus:

Nowadays we sleep in an age where in that respect is a technology battle front being waged against citizens of the Westward and the people are losing it on every front – nowhere is that battle raging well-nig in Western democracies than in Britain.

Britain already has a repute for deploying the most intrusive surveillance systems against its own populate in the Western world. Widely reportable precisely a few days past, it appears the government has antitrust awarded itself the ability to monitor and surveil the live communication theory of the Brits general public at wish. In addition, it too forces encoding backdoors to cost made available to the authorities by seclusion driven communications services such as WhatsApp. This is an tap that will see a tidy degrading of security department for everyone in Britain, which will inevitably lead to hugely hyperbolic hacking by criminals.

The realness though is much Sir Thomas More insidious than first intellection. Although we all assure the sensation in security keeping up with loyal changing technologies, the government has been passing laws that in event has done little many than salami-slice our political entity liberties and human rights to the indicate of extinguishing their real effectiveness. They are are being systematically dismantled, driven through the false narrative of security department. American Samoa a reality check, you are far Sir Thomas More likely to die at the hands of your underwear or toaster than a terrorist.

Just last month legislation was passed that restrained a section stating patrol can order the shutdown of communications on a cell.  This ability too allows authorities to restrict or disable a person's fluid phone communications (at will) if they are suspected of even up being associated with crimes, whether or not they take actually committed a crime or not.

Any idea of where this is leading to? How about a report by Salon eligible: "The chilling tech that brings "Nonage Report" inches from realness."

Salon reviews a new documentary on "Pre-Crime" that shows how police use big information to stalk electric potential offenders who've yet to break through the law.

"As shown in "Pre-Law-breaking"— the documentary premiered end weekend at Toronto's Hot Docs film festival — police departments around the world are partnering with privy companies to utilise public data, ain information and algorithms to predict where illegal actions are about likely to fall out and, crucially, who is nearly equiprobable to commit them."

And just for clarity the German director of the documentary says "Pre-crime" is a reference to a Screenland film called "Minority Report" in which people are arrested for crimes they have not committed – yet.

The documentary explains how police forces are now already victimization algorithms to calculate the risk of an individual breaking the law.

"There's a list in Chicago with 1,500 people thereon. They are under surveillance by the police and there is a extra algorithmic rule that calculates the risk of you committing a crime."

Salon asks the question – "There are predictive police programs in Fresno, Philadelphia, Chicago, and in Kent and Greater London, England  featured in the film. Are these entirely pilot programs? And the shivery answer from the director of the documentary "Non some thirster. Kent's program is 4 age old."

Settled on a story past famed science fiction writer Philip K. Hawkshaw, "Minority Report" is a thriller set in Washington D.C. D.C. in 2054, where police utilise technology to arrest and jail bird murderers before they commit their crime

The documentary maker emphasises the point that:

"Forecasting computer software and algorithms that have been criticised as inaccurate and capricious are used to hoard information, and reminder and flag people. But prophetic tools are only as good Eastern Samoa the information they'Ra fed. With deficient evidence of the dependableness of the data sources or the truth of the data crunching, misfires are a guarantee. In this chilling and explosive in-depth examination into the modern age of policing, directors Monika Hielscher and Matthias Heider pose an principal interrogation: How much exemption and hominine awareness are we happy to give to the limited logic of technology."

The New York Times reports that

"The Dry land Civil Liberties Union, citing reports that the Newmarket Police Section used electronic computer analysis to create a "heat list" that below the belt related exculpatory people with reprehensible behavior, has warned about the dangers of the police using big data. Straight-grained companies that take in money doing this kind of knead warn that it comes with civil rights risks."

Backwards in Britain, we know that our have Premier Minister is no Friend of subject liberties when considering her book atomic number 3 Home base Escritoire. She oversaw GCHQ's illegal bulk harvest home programmes pre and Wiley Post Snowden revelations. She proven to fall the Communications Information Bill (also noted arsenic the snoopers take) in 2012 only it was rejected at draft stagecoach when the Lib Dems withdrew their patronise for information technology. The Investigatory Powers Act, was a much broader bill but this was really her second attempt at introducing the snoopers' charter.

She has no doubt supported the Espionage Handbill – a proposal to criminalise whistleblowers and jail journalists as foreign spies. The 20% cut in the Law budget has been replaced with a ramping up of GCHQ's budget – an unelected agency WHO dissemble in the shadows and break the legal philosophy with impunity without full scrutiny or governance, and who, aside altogether accounts, are inextricably interlinked thereto other notorious lawbreaker – the NSA.

Don River't forget that Rockwell Kent police deliver allegedly been using this system secretly for four years. Over again we rule United Kingdom beingness the pioneer of the dismantling of democratic freedoms and rights without just as very much like the faintest debate every bit to its legitimacy.

In a Guardian article just deuce days agone regarding the GB's speedily declining democracy, it reported a truly disgraceful pre-law-breaking operation already in practice:

"Documents seen by the Observer show that this was a proposal to capture citizens' browse chronicle en masse, recording call conversations and applying self-generated language processing to the recorded voice data to build a national patrol database, self-contained with scores for for each one citizen happening their propensity to perpetrate law-breaking. The plan put to the minister was Minority Report. It was pre-law-breaking. And the fact that Cambridge Analytica (the company concerned in data collection) is now working inside the Pentagon is, I think, absolutely terrifying."

Cambridge Analytica have been heavily associated with 'dark money' and the unreal actors that secured the Brexit vote in Britain next-to-last year. Its parent company is known for involvement in noncombatant disinformation campaigns of gregarious media and voter targeting and is put-upon past the military and politicians to study and manipulate public opinion and sentiment will.

In the meantime, Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhi May has wholeheartedly pushed for Britain's withdrawal from the European convention on human rights – which would lead Gt. Britain American Samoa the only European nation in the similar position as the Ishmael state of Belarus where corruption is endemic through the entirety of its society and criticism of the president and the government is a illegal offence.

UK Prime Minister Theresa May

Hence, the reason why such programmes are dangerous in the hands of a government that not lonesome has 'mannikin' merely will before long be an emboldened one add up June 8th when what is left of an already weakened foema splinters and so disintegrates, departure civil gild many susceptible than ever.

And as Civil Society Future points out in a late article on national society in an years of surveillance:

"Citizens are increasingly categorised and profiled according to information assemblages, for instance through data dozens used in the condemnable justice system or past friendly credit scores, Eastern Samoa developed in China. The propose of such slews is to predict future behaviour and allocate resources and eligibility for services (or punishment) accordingly.

Can you imagine living in a companionship that predicts future behaviour and allocates resources and eligibility for services, or dishes out punishments – though an algorithm?

And when IT comes to these citizen controlling pieces of legislating – mission creep is the loud danger. Terrorism laws developed from 2000, which were designed to hunt down ideological killers, have since been added to or amended twelve multiplication. The result is that local authorities and councils are now competent to brazenly use these Torah to pursue citizens for eating the stateless, the BBC to pursue non payment of its licence fee, OR whatsoever government agency to on the Q.T. follow people without their noesis and record their movements. This should be seen as nothing less than abuse of power.

I asked Jim Killock, Executive of Open Rights Radical for an view happening pre-crime systems. His response was unequivocal:

"Pre-crime sleuthing systems undermine the underlying tenet of our discriminative system – that we are innocent until proven guilty. They fail to meet any test of proportionality and jeopardise our privacy rights.

"Lately the Digital Economy Act gave the police the powers to disable people's phones if they are suspected of criminal activity. This is just one example of how such systems sack Be used against individuals who have non actually been found guilty of a crime.

We need a full populace debate about whether such systems are unobjectionable in a democratic company. These systems look connected algorithms, which we know can replicate biases that are found in society – for representative approximately belt along, class and gender. We need more transparency about how these systems are mature, applied and monitored.

We screw that surveillance has been used against the victims of crime, so much asStephen Lawrence's family, every bit well as Green politicians, such asCaroline Lucan MP and Baroness Jenny Jones. IT is not difficult to figure of speech how these systems could be utilised against anyone who challenges the status quo or holds positions that are not considered mainstream."

Current Conflict Where Civil Liberties and Human Rights Are at Stake

Source: https://southfront.org/britains-intrusive-surveillance-system-threat-to-civil-liberties-and-human-rights/